Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsanto's Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Monsanto's Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural nomination. PROD removed without reason. Doesn't look to be much coverage. Black Kite (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as PRODer. I went through the sources, and there's only tangential mention as a WP:NEOLOGISM. The main one was internal company-speak within the company about mirroring Moore's Law that hasn't got significant coverage, especially since that was back in 1997. The other part of the mishmash was from this source about a nickname for a Mexican law that doesn't appear to have any standing over time. It's basically been a string of words a rare source uses rather than a concrete topic, so I don't see any use for a redirect anywhere either. Kingofaces43 (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - As above, WP:NEOLOGISM article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent sources for of any of the several uses of the term used in the article.Dialectric (talk) 13:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. Bakazaka (talk) 23:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete delete it already. Calm Omaha (talk) 23:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete on account of the subject entirely lacking notability outside one single primary source, the corporation's 1997 annual report, which is not available online any more. (We learn of its content through secondary sources.) If the neologism had caught on, it'd have been acceptable. But it hasn't so it's not. -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.