Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster (Usher album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Monster (Usher album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. This is enough information to be moved to the main article Usher. The music article has no official, track listing, and hardly any background. It should be moved back to main article. Only one confirmed producer and the other are unconfirmed. Badly written with just rumors of what might happen. Lovejonesfly (talk) 01:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:27, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. It has yet to be released and has not established any notability to date though it is an anticipated album. Premature article and perhaps premature deletion. Too difficult to rate. BioDetective2508 (talk) 04:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. How is it to difficult rate when it can be merged with main article, Usher. Lovejonesfly (talk) 15:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: once the track list and release date are also confirmed, it will qualify for its own article. Until then, this info should be in the artist's article.  Cliff smith  talk  16:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.