Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsters, Inc. 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    WP:SNOW delete. WP:V issues, apparent hoax. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Monsters, Inc. 2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A hoax. Pete Docter has denied making a sequel, because they have no good ideas for it. Alientraveller (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if it's not a hoax, it doesn't get an article until production begins. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * G3 Blatant misinformation. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 15:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems kind of crystal ball-ish to me.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think it's articles like this that means things like Wp:CRYSTAL exists, because this fails it. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  20:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nonsense. Bazj (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. — Erik (talk • contrib) 23:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant hoax. -Senseless!... says you, says me 03:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.