Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monte Carlo Universal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PeterSymonds (talk)  15:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Monte Carlo Universal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent, published sources to show that this methodology is notable Gwernol 13:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- WilliamH (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Publicity stunt, un-notable project. I doubt one in ten thousand numerical analysts has ever heard of it. Ray Yang (talk) 21:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like a set of software. This paper is the only one using it, but one of the authors is from the Kurchatov Institute, so it is not an independent source. By the look of it, its developers are the only ones using the software/methology. There are a few dozen users of the software . Narayanese (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Gets three relevant hits in Google Scholar. Is that enough for notability? Beats me.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper    76  23:17, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Three Google Scholar hits is an excellent indication that this is not notable. --Crusio (talk) 23:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Monte Carlo method QuantumShadow (talk) 12:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the project does not appear to be notable. Google scholar results would seem to indicate that not much notice has been taken with this project.  Oppose merge as a non-notable project that uses the method isn't suitable merge material. -- Whpq (talk) 16:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.