Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monte Vista, Ma On Shan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. The issue of merging can be discussed on the article's talk page. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Monte Vista, Ma On Shan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

housing estates in Hong Kong are a dime a dozen, and there is nothing here which indicates how this might be notable. The sources are either directory links or are nnot independent of the subject Ohconfucius (talk) 06:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge or Rename This article should either be merge into one location with other private estates in Ma On Shan or if we decided to keep it at the current location then it definitely needs to be renamed to Monte Vista (Hong Kong). Tavatar (talk) 20:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 23:03, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep and Rename. It is one of the largest private housing estates in Ma On Shan, one of the new towns in Hong Kong. Its existance can be shown in its developer's webpage. http://www.ckh.com.hk/eng/property/completed/residential/monte.html The article may be renamed as Monte Vista (Hong Kong) to show it is from Hong Kong. Maybe seldom non-Hongkongers know where Ma On Shan is. Ricky@36 (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep not because it exists or the company that built it also wrote a webpage for it, but because journalists wrote dozens of newspaper articles about it: . Statements like "housing estates in Hong Kong are a dime a dozen" don't actually prove any failure of WP:N or other inclusion criteria. cab (talk) 09:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per cab. There seems to be enough significant coverage for our guidelines.  I would advise the nom to employ WP:BEFORE prior to nominating all of these "dime a dozen" Hong Kong estates articles for AfD.--Oakshade (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.