Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montfort Realschule Zell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was every ounce of deletionism in my soul is crying out against it, but it's a keeper. The nomination rests on the article being a) trash, and b) unverifiable, and the article has been both cleaned up and verified. Verifiability wipes out a swathe of the good arguments for deletion straight away (for all the three people who argued for deletion). I would discount User:Jcuk's views because he hasn't bothered to provide an argument, but it doesn't really matter. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Montfort Realschule Zell
I haven't taken part in the "school wars" for a while, so excuse me if I have broken some sort of truce or understanding. Google gives me nothing. The article makes no claim to notability. I almost speedied this trash (actually I almost Template:proded it.) BrokenSegue 04:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, unreferenced and unverifiable. KrazyCaley/That's Krazy Talk  04:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see anything noteworthy about this school based on the article or Google.  It's no Exeter or Andover, I'm sure.  --Kinu 04:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Abstaining from this and all other school articles until school articles are no longer treated as geographical articles with automatic notability assumed Ruby 07:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: it does have a homepage. No vote. u p p l a n d 10:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep of course Jcuk 11:31, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.