Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montgomery Blencowe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹   15:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Montgomery Blencowe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. I have not found any significant coverage of the works of this person. He has been one of the seventeen executive producers for the movie The Prince and I've found a reliable source that confirms it but other than that, there is nothing else. At best, it seems a case of WP:TOOSOON. ► LowLevel (talk) 05:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 06:19, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject is just one non-notable member of a very large production crew for a single movie. No significant coverage of this person in reliable, independent sources. The only reference is to a three sentence obituary of his father, which mentions him as a surviving son. This pro-forma obituary makes no credible claim of notability for either father or son. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject has been referenced by 2 reliable external sources for the production of the film The Prince, including the Variety magazine and the Hollywood Reporter. Applying information from the Internet Movie Database, He has been involved in 2 more films since. The obituary provides sufficient evidence to his personal life 6bbm0310 (talk) 14:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Since I've found the signature of the previous comment a bit confusing, I just want to clarify to other readers that the previous comment is not by User:Cullen328, but by User:6bbm0310, the creator of the discussed article. ► LowLevel (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You are correct, . I am guessing that the user was trying to emulate my signature, and messed things up a bit. No big deal. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   06:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete. Easy call.  Completely lacking reliable independent secondary sources actually about the subject.  All we have are two completely bare mentions of the subject's name only – the absolute essence of a trivial mention – and some citations to IMDB, which is not considered a reliable source here on WP.  Googling and newspapers.com both turned up nothing (no surprise.)  Msnicki (talk) 06:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Name listed in the credits of 1 or more movies is not nearly enough. – Margin1522 (talk) 07:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.