Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monthly Aanchal (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have to go with delete here despite little discussion, because the article is indeed completely unsourced.  Sandstein  17:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Monthly Aanchal
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing in coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  13:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that the article is not eligible for soft deletion as the last AfD resulted in "no consensus".

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 15:02, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article is unreferenced and self-contradictory (established in 1969 or 1979?). Its claim to being "the oldest Magazine or Digest of Pakistan in continuous publication" needs a verifiable source (and a publication such as Urdu Digest appears to be older, challenging that claim). If the article is to remain, the text needs some mooring in references (and the passing mentions in lists identified in the first AfD are not enough). I'm happy to revise my view if such sources can be identified to rectify the text, but as things stand this fails WP:PRODUCT (and the publisher has no article which could serve as a redirect target) and WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.