Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montonio

Montonio was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Nonnotable vanity by what seems to be a group of people editing from the same IP: also see below. Yelyos 01:41, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * I think this fits the definition of patent nonsense #2: Stuff that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make head or tail of it. After reading these sentences, albeit completely grammatical, they leave me with no idea what or who the author is talking about. IMHO this is a speedy candidate. If the admins disagree, then my vote is delete. [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#9786;]] 01:54, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Prank. Possible speedy as a bad joke, too. Geogre 05:23, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Speedy would be even better. Kappa 08:46, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. My head hurt after reading this.  [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 05:23, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I find the article "neither hilarious nor offensive" and vote to delete it. DCEdwards1966 04:29, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Ta bu shi da yu 01:34, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems nonsensical, though Gibbons are cool. --MaxPower 19:32, 2004 Nov 22 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.