Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montreal Oil Refining Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Montreal Oil Refining Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Completely unsourced, may have been copy-pasted from somewhere. &mdash; CIS (talk | stalk) 21:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * First, a note: there's a current WP:RM running on the article, which I'm fairly sure is at least partially what prompted this request. I pretty much raised the concern about this list being somewhat indiscriminate during the RM discussion, since a list of Oil Refineries which happen to be located in geographically close proximity to Montreal isn't exactly the most discriminating list criteria. That being said, did point out that they are colloquially referred to by the [Quebeqois] as "quartier des raffineries", so the association seems to be valid. In the end I think that the article needs work (starting with a rename, IMO; continuing with some serious referencing), but it's still a valid article. Of course, I'm just there for the RM really, so in the end it's not all that important to me, but that's my take on the whole situation. — V = I * R (talk to Ohms law) 01:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. User:CorenSearchBot/manual says that Montreal Oil Refining Center, as of 01:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC), did not appear to be a copyright violation. – Eastmain (talk • contribs)  02:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note on comment: it's important to not overestimate CSBot's assessment either: while it has a reasonably low false positive rate, a negative means little except "I couldn't find an obvious copy" not that it isn't one. &mdash; Coren (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd like to know what makes this article a suspect in the first place. ¨¨ victor  falk  10:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  — Eastmain (talk • contribs)  02:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If in fact the cluster is never referred to as a whole, I support deletion. 117Avenue (talk) 03:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I strongly oppose deletion! Of course the cluster is always refered too as a whole when people talk of the refineries in Montréal! People don't say the shell refinery, or the esso refenery! In fact, I looked up this article in order to know how many refeneries there were in the cluster and what were their names! --YapaTi (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Unsourced is no reason to delete, and the allegations of copyvio seem to be made of thin air. ¨¨ victor  falk  10:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with the comment above there dose not seem to be a major copyvio problem. The article dose need a lot of clean up and references.  Kyle  1278  20:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment this article cannot stay at the current title, in its current form. However, it does not necessarily need to be deleted. Currently, there is no claim to notability, and without references showing notability, it cannot stay as it is. However, if it were moved, per the WP:RM discussion, and modified to fit the new name, it plausibly can remain. I would ask for a procedural close until the WP:RM discussion has had a chance to run its course. DigitalC (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, reference, rename and improve. A notable district spanning a great deal of Montreal's east end, particularly the city of Montreal East. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.