Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monty Munford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep, nom withdrawn. NAC. Cliff smith talk  16:37, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Monty Munford

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable actor; article created by a single-purpose account. Prod contested by IP, which might be the same user. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. Yes, he appears to fail WP:ENT, but meets notability through WP:GNG for things other than acting.  Yes, its newbie author User:Montysmobile apparently has a WP:COI... but I won't hold it against the author since now that the article is here it belongs to the project.  As a sidebar, it could easily seem that every new editor would appear to be a WP:SPA... until they make more than a few edits and move on to other articles.  In his newbieness, the author simply picked the wrong thing for which to assert a notability.  Keeping in mind that the article is now Wikipedia's, I looked at it on its own merits... judging the message rather than the messenger, and looked toward possibilities.  Given: the original sorry stub article mentioned two films he's completed, and two un-named films he is currently working in.  But in digging a bit, I learned that his notability is found elsewhere and for other things.  Using the author's username as a clue, a search for sources finds this individual has greater notability as an individual involved in U.K. and India mobile media, and who is also a tech journalist with a long-running column in Times of India,  but who has also had some roles in Bollywood films.  As the fellow meets WP:GNG for things other than his acting, the article will need expansion and sourcing to change its focus... with perhaps only a sourced mention of his acting set in context to his overall career in other fields.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note Article improvements have begun, and what started as three meager and unsourced sentences is becoming something more encyclopedic and far better sourced.  And yes... more work will be done.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:32, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Due to Schmidt's improvements, I withdraw the nomination. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.