Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monumenta Serica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I am withdrawing my nomination due to information provided by Randykitty during this AfD discussion, See below. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Steve Quinn (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Monumenta Serica

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails GNG and NJOURNALS. No indication of notability. This journal is not listed in any selective databases and I'm not seeing coverage in other independent secondary sources. Steve Quinn (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is really bad, not even listing the ISSN, but according to MIAR the journal is listed in Scopus (verification), which satisfies NJournals. --Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Based on information provided by Randykitty, I am withdrawing my nomination. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 20:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.