Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monzur Sadek Khosnobish (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:57, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Monzur Sadek Khosnobish (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like a resume (also this is a misuse of a DAB page it looks like) Wgolf (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC) Should add-looks like an autobiography as well (probably should move the page without the DAB link-I'll do that now) Wgolf (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly a misuse of DAB, Also we aren't a resume host. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  22:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * speaking of which someone has been misusing DAB's as of late so I decided to move these pages and turn them into one, but it was still amess anyway. But yes this is a misuse. Wgolf (talk) 22:10, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment If an editor  was confused & marked something as a dab p when it's an ordinary article,  this is something that can very easily be corrected and is not an argument for deletion.  It was also tagged a7, but I removed the speedy--it has a plausible claim to significance, but I'm not yet sure of notability .  DGG ( talk ) 07:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  02:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Nothing for him or his publication. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.