Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moon science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Moon science

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This appears to be some combination of WP:OR and WP:Synth. The references initially gave me pause, but they don't reinforce whatever the point of the main article. Even if the synth concerns were removed, this would be a poor amalgamation of what we already have a category about: Category:Lunar science. Shadowjams (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  06:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOT, WP:ROSE-COLORED CRYSTAL. There are good reasons for going back, but this looks like unnecessary amateur guesswork. Compare with Exploration of the Moon and Colonization of the Moon.   — Rankiri (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, after deletion, this could probably serve as a reasonable redirect to Geology of the Moon. — Rankiri (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;Yes I agree with Rankiri that this type of information belongs on Exploration of the Moon and/or Colonization of the Moon. While well intentioned, I think the current article is a little too thin.&mdash;RJH (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. Nothing that isn't replicated elsewhere. Colds7ream (talk) 07:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment The established term is Lunar Science (currently redirects to Selenography). The article should be renamed to Lunar Science and stubified. Ruslik_ Zero 19:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you mean redirected. Shadowjams (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOT and redirect per usage at 70.29.210.242 (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.