Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonblink Communications


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Moonblink Communications

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable company. While they may distribute products from notable companies, the company itself is not notable. All but one listed reference are press releases that do not provide any depth of coverage. The one reference that is not a PR piece does not provide much depth of coverage either. Looking for additional references results in more press releases about distribution deals. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. One of the many spam by stealth articles. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Sources offered and those I was able to find through Google all boiled down to a lot routine coverage of the subject's press releases.  Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION.  Msnicki (talk) 00:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH. I don't see independent sources.  Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.