Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonlight Sunrise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Moonlight Sunrise

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a song from an album. Does not meet GNG or NSONG, sources are promotional in nature and do not meet WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy :: talk  06:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Wait then merge with article for album once it is created. –DMartin  06:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Korea. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 13:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Article seems fine to me, but if it's not getting kept as is then I say and see how it charts in the coming weeks. This group's singles chart quite consistently so I'm sure it'll get to notability on the numbers soon enough. And for what it's worth, I definitely strongly disagree with DMartin's proposal; we can't propose a merger or redirect with an article that doesn't exist yet, especially when that project doesn't appear to even have a name or release day. QuietHere (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Changing to keep given apparent consensus in subsequent votes. As I said, I also believe in the song's charting potential which will come soon enough. Seems a waste of time to take it down now just to have it back up in a few days, especially when the sourcing is already decent. QuietHere (talk) 05:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Twice singles discography for now. Not enough coverage upon release. SBKSPP (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Wait according to WP:NSONG we should wait for chart data to be released, additionally there are independent coverage such as . Lightoil (talk) 03:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Song is guaranteed to chart in Korea (just as Twice's previous English-language song "The Feels" did) and at least a couple of other countries because Twice are one of the biggest K-pop girl groups in the world. I understand the sourcing is not the best at present but this is definitely a case for waiting a week for the ensuing coverage and charting to dispel any doubts about its notability.  Ss  112   07:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. For now, it is a new song and we don't know how big it will get, but It will eventually get enough since there are articles for the feels and talk that talk Jishiboka1 (talk) 09:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as Ss112 and Jishiboka1 --PepeBonus (talk) 04:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The song has charted in Japan and the article has several independent sources (reviews from NPR Music and NME). Random86 (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep now that the song has the appropriate sourcing and has now charted in Japan. —Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  05:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: and Japan Hot 100 at 20th place  Sin syuan ~ Ta lk  05:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.