Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moophasa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. nn neologism Madchester 03:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

moophasa
Delete. This seems to be a neologism that isn't notable and isn't verifiable. From the article: "It is not yet a 'household' word, however there are several small groups of people circulating it, so it could soon become extremely popular." The article gives no cites for usage and I searched using Google and could not find any significant usage of the term. Although it has a "What does it mean" section, the article doesn't even actually ever say what the term means, only what it doesn't. The article has a significant edit history, but much of it is from anons, and the one non anon user, Otware (User talk:Otware) doesn't seem to have a lot of presence.

Please be gentle with me if I did not do this quite right, this is my first AfD nomination! Some inclusionist *I* am! ++Lar: t/c 16:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Samuel J. Howard 18:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete complete bollocks Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 18:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism. N Shar 19:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism.--Srleffler 21:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Percy Snoodle 21:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lar, you did it alright, and there's nothing deletionist about wanting to remove (in my words) "pure crap". -- Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 22:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as patently unverifiable. Cyde Weys votetalk 00:25, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, unstable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. See WP:NEO. Stifle 23:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.