Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moosebutter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carabinieri 14:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Moosebutter

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Also associated image files Image:Moosewestonmonchichi.jpg, Image:Mooseglenheadphones.jpg, Image:Moosetimhorns.jpg, and Image:Moosechrisfrog.jpg. &mdash; Whedonette (ping) 03:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. &mdash; Whedonette (ping) 03:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BAND because it fails to provide sources. Darkspots 03:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Tour destinations have included Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, Idaho..." - any non-corn-producing states? --Infrangible 03:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Are you suggesting that the production of corn in certain states makes them less notable as tour destinations? —Carolfrog 23:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep who hasn't heard their version of Star Wars? Nardman1 04:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I hasn't... but that by itself doesn't mean they're not notable. On the other hand, if you know of any reviews or sources independent of their website with a review or report on them, that would help.   ◄    Zahakiel    ►   04:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a very super incredibly amazingly famous song, but yeah, the major problem with this article is that its only source has long been the band's website. No good. --Masamage 04:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Definitely tough. Quite well-known, but no easily-found sources. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 11:28, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is not notable, due to the fact it does not produce multiple, reliable published sources. If they are found, I might be swayed toward keeping this article. Yuser31415 06:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've added a link, but this DOES need serious clean up. Reads like a fan site. Neonblak 22:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand to justify claim of notability. --Masamage 06:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN; what element of WP:MUSIC do people contend they fulfill? RGTraynor 18:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure they have been covered in at least one magazine. Certainly that will have to be proven. --Masamage 18:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And failing that proof (which I see has not yet arrived), this fails WP:ATT and so should be deleted. RGTraynor 17:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No need to be confrontational. I don't disagree. --Masamage 18:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no refs at all. NBeale 17:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.