Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moot (app)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Obvious promo by undeclared paid editor blocked after warning about spamming Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Moot (app)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP, largely unsourced. Kleuske (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:A7 and WP:G11. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc) 01:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant advertising of non notable company. The user also crated Moot Rewards; their absolutely non notable business program, so as to further the promotion. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Some observation -I will like to further note one thing. Whenever the page is tagged for deletion, the author will put db-author, so that it will be seen as less serious deletion and easily refunded. This has happended twice on Moot Technologies where the page was originally created. And after some time, the author simply requested refund, it currently exist in draft Draft:Moot Technologies after such "refund". Even on this title, they tried this trick, [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/836861870 see it], so as to scuttle this AfD and easily request "refund". The current author is either evading block placed on or is coordinating things with him. The contents of all the versions are viewable through filter log and shows similitude beyond coincidence –Ammarpad (talk) 13:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete- Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, not enough coverage about the company and no indicator of why it is notable among shopping apps.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: The references offered on this WP:SPA article are no more than typical start-up propositional coverage. I added the company name and the shifting name of its product to the "Find sources" above, but am finding nothing to indicate attained encyclopaedic notability whether by WP:CORPDEPTH on the company or WP:GNG on its app. AllyD (talk) 06:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.