Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moote

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 00:35, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Moote
Clearly promotion for the band, no attempt to even make it look like an encyclopaedic entry Ebz 00:11, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious band vanity Soltak 00:14, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Soltak. --Lomedae 01:29, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. “Non-notable”, “unencyclopedic” and “vanity” are just some of the words that have been used to describe this article. -- BD2412 talk 01:30, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Jaxl | talk 01:44, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; van, nn Celcius 01:54, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why would they write Scheduled for release on 6th June 2005... in an article created on June 9th? Flowerparty  talk 01:45, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant band vanity and use of marketing talk. - Mgm|(talk) 07:32, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for obvious reasons. HipHopOppotomus 09:06, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Erwin Walsh
 * Delete Vanity --Dysepsion 22:43, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.