Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morals mangler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Morals mangler
Partly a how-to guide for a non-notable cocktail, and partly a vanity article on Durham University students. Not encyclopedic material as it's original research, not verifiable and vanity. Delete. Sliggy 13:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, unverifiable, vanity and last of all, Wikipedia is not a cookbook. --Ter e nce Ong 14:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, zero ghits. The article seems familiar; is it maybe recreation of deleted material (and thus speedily deletable)? Weregerbil 14:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted material: Morals Mangler AfD. Weregerbil 14:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete College students mixing a bunch of spirits together and getting really, really drunk on the mix is not notable, and there is no point in cataloging the endless possible combinations they might use. Fan1967 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Heh, Fan-1967, hillarious comment. -- Alpha269 15:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I went to college, too. Believe it or not, even back during the Ford administration, we got drunk on ridiculous mixtures of awful stuff, and they hadn't even discovered Jagermeister yet. Not notable then or now. Fan1967 15:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

(UTC)
 * Delete, vanity, OR, unverifiable... sounds like a poor man's Long Island iced tea. -- Kinu t /c  21:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per well argued nomination. ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  23:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.