Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moravia High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure)  Jay Jay Talk to me 20:31, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Moravia High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

School without independent sources to prove notability. Fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 15:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve per norm on notability of high schools. AllyD (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a high school, and it just needs to be improved a bit more, as it is already notable. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep high schools can be assumed to be notable. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * KEEP - per WP:OUTCOMES. It has news coverage. It's a high school.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep High schools are considered notable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy close This has a snow chance of resulting in a deletion as described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Notability (high schools). Mkdw talk 23:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - looking at Google searches there are plenty enough sources that can be mined to establish compliance with WP:ORG. No evidence of WP:BEFORE due diligence. TerriersFan (talk) 01:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 08:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verified secondary school, which should be kept for all the usual reasons. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.