Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morbid Saint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Morbid Saint

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Fails WP:MUSIC: no charting, does not have significant independent coverage. Prod was removed by IP without comment. Onthegogo (talk) 22:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per WP:BAND, signed on a major label. The external links show that there is significant coverage about them thus passing WP:BAND109.64.96.169 . I added a source with them as the subject. (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as with WP:BAND - MS are a credible underground metal act with a 20+ year history and multiple reissues of their debut, plus it is being re-released yet again on Relapse Records with extra, new tracks. Why can't we just add some more references instead of just purging? Best, A Sniper (talk) 02:15, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.