Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mordellistena gilvifrons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Interstellarity (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Mordellistena gilvifrons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article hasn't been expanded much at all. The searches I've been getting have reliable sources, but the sources talk the subject very vaguely which means it doesn't meet the general notability guideline. There are no subject-specific notability guidelines about the animal. For these reasons, I think this is a good candidate for deletion. Interstellarity (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * sigh... Speedy Keep I need a template for these things. WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES; accepted and described taxon, well-formed and sufficiently referenced stub, several tens of thousands of others like it in existence. Here's a couple hundred in the same genus for you to nominate. Please don't do that. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per WP:OUTCOMES Lightburst (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.