Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/More on ehcp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

More on ehcp

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Because my earlier AfD on two articles in one (this being the second) was closed without this article being deleted or considered (yes I know that having more than one article in a AfD is bad practice, but it worked for me in the past, so I'm gonna accept the verdict and create a new one). . Again, Wikipedia is not a guide on how to use software, nor is it a place to copy+paste information from a off-site wiki. &eta;oian  &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  07:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Add any relevant information to ehcp. Why on earth would we have two (short) articles on the same subject? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 03:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with the existing article on ehcp. This whole article is ridiculous, starting with the title. --MelanieN (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Delete This article is almost devoid of conent and doesn't contribute anything new that isn't already in ehcp. OCNative (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.