Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morgan Taylor Campbell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Spooksville (TV series). Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  08:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  07:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Morgan Taylor Campbell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP Notability tagged in March 2014, and not much has changed in the meantime. Fails WP:NACTOR (most notable role to date is Spooksville (TV series), and it was only a recurring role that does not get her mentioned in the only press on the show). Other refs at article (some of which I added myself) are basically passing mentions – not enough to establish notability. Basically WP:TOOSOON. However, as an "up-and-coming young actress", Dratifying/Userfying might be appropriate in this case. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:22, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Her recurring roles are barely a couple of episodes here and there. Her article looks like another IMDb retread from either a fan, herself, or someone close to her. You can't "-ify" anything without something concrete. —  Wylie pedia  13:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Spooksville (TV series). Leaving a redlink just invites the article to be recreated. A redirect allows edit history to be preserved, and if it is no longer TOOSOON, makes spinning out a better article at a later date much easier. Also a merge is in line with WP:BEFORE: "If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term."   Montanabw (talk)  03:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.