Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moritz Neumüller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Insufficient discussion for consensus.  Sandstein  07:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Moritz Neumüller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no proof of notability no refs could be a hoax too  Varun FEB2003    12:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: Rather than speculate about a hoax, did the nominator conduct a WP:BEFORE check, which would show for example the subject's University of Vienna homepage? AllyD (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep., probably speedy keep , as what is sjhown by the publications clearly meets the standards for notability.  DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Subject exists, but I am not sure he passes WP:PROF. His works in GScholar seem to have only several citations each; I am not sure if his impact on the field is significant. Ping User:Randykitty. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:51, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.