Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mornington Tenpin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Mornington Tenpin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not seeing any notability, let alone significant coverage in independent sources, as per WP:GNG The-Pope (talk) 17:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi. The article about Mornington is correct information. As a former employee there (and Moonah as well), I played at the centre, I'm also longtime friends with two former managers of the facility and also, a lot of information provided comes courtesy of the 1992 STTBA (Southern Tasmanian Tenpin Bowling Association) end of season report from that year. By the way, Charles Martin Construction were a well known business in Hobart during the 1980s who built and ran the centre for tax purposes, they had a manager who oversaw the centre manager and made decisions on their behalf. They unfortunately went broke in late 1989. Forfuxake (talk) 19:33, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The issue is not about accuracy, but about notability and verifiability.The-Pope (talk) 08:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Jenks24 (talk) 08:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. While I have no doubt that all the information in the article is correct, simply being true does not confer notability. The article is presently unreferenced and I can't find any reliable sources discussing Mornington Tenpin, let alone any that could be considered the significant coverage that is required to pass the general notability guideline. Jenks24 (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable business, fails WP:CORP. WWGB (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete no significant coverage. A completely useless history to anyone not involved this suburban facility. Would hardly think the Tasmanian tenpin bowling scene gets any third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 12:35, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely non-notable. StAnselm (talk) 04:54, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.