Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morphobank


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. References noted by Nalacetus were added to the article, which nudges it into the keep column. - Krakatoa  Katie  04:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Morphobank

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:WEB tests, e.g. "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself.". Article just seems to promote the morphobank web site. Oscarthecat 21:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 23:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This page provides information on not just a web site, but a new web-based application for performing group systematics projects. There have been papers in Nature, Science, and Trends in Ecology and Evolution discussing and using MorphoBank as a reference and repository for phylogenetic matrices. These references as well as a brief history of Morphobank can be added to make the page sound more encyclopedic. Nalacetus 00:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- pending the addition of the references specified. I am not sure the screenshots are encyclopedic content, even if they were to be licensed. DGG (talk) 05:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of significant coverage.  I do not see these refs yet Corpx 06:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - likely notability per WP:ORG (which basically states: "has been the subject of coverage in secondary [reliable] sources"), this does not fall under WP:WEB. Not that many sources online, but several of them are from the academic community and there seems to be some enthusiasm for this (new?) product. -- Steve Hart 01:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; it's web contents, it falls under WP:WEB (and fails to meet it). &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.