Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morristown Jewish Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Given the nature of this split, and the fact that the now blocked (but non-sock) position was rebutted without response, and lacked any reasoning on why the sources would be sufficient, and both other keeps were weak, a clear Keep would seem unwarranted. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Morristown Jewish Center

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet GNG. No independent sources. Searching finds some coverage in the local Morristown newspaper and many passing mentions. Overall, just routine coverage. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion: previously PRODded. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MB 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Sources - [this one]. --CappellsFromSkelmersdale (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * That is not an article about the center with in-depth coverage; it is another passing mention: "the Morristown Jewish Center Beit Yisrael donated to Morristown National Historical Park (NHP) a high chest purported to have John Hancock provenance." MB 15:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:54, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This article is light on sources but I think can be brought up to standards. I have added a few sources and will be adding more in the coming days. I think there still could be notability issues through. Jmbranum (talk) 05:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as above, the article just scrapes by with RS, but there seems to be historical importance with the centre. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.