Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mort's Palisades Deli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  20:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Mort's Palisades Deli

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This place gets lots of mentions, due to its use on Curb Your Enthusiasm, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Confused, but probably still keep - To be a WP:CORP pass we just need significant coverage in two sources, one of them national/state/regional. The Jewish Journal appears to be a source with national reach (e.g., paper circulation of 150,000, 500,000 unique online users each month), the article includes an extended paragraph on Mort's Deli and seems to pass WP:SIGCOV (i.e., it discusses the subject in detail, not just a passing mention). I also see an extend-para review in Fodor's, and a listing in Paul Wallach's guide, a story on CBS LA, another story on CBS 7, a multi-paragraph LA Times review. I think this is a WP:CORP pass based on the LA Times and JJ pieces alone. UPDATE: are there two Mort's Deli's in LA? There appears to be one in Palisades and one in Tarzana, both pretty old. That makes things more complicated, but I'd probably still vote keep on the basis of the JJ coverage and the Palisadian Post article (i.e., one national instance of SIGCOV and another local). FOARP (talk) 16:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:14, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:38, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Hopefully this attracts more participation.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Has a few mentions in Los Angeles magazine in 1998 and 2000 (or thereabouts) in a quickie G search, seems to pass the smell test. Lots of book mentions also. Oaktree b (talk) 16:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.