Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mortal Kombat: Devastation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 02:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Mortal Kombat: Devastation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has had some big problems with crystal balling and verifiability in the past (look through the history). Removing everything that was conjecture and unsourced info leaves one with an extremely meager article, that doesn't even include an official confirmation of it being in production from the studio or games company. Per suggestion of User:Erikster it might be possible to merge some content back to Mortal Kombat: Annihilation. Codemonkey 03:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- absolute lack of solid production news. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 03:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPG-GR 03:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently a script is being written, and one person has been cast. That's like writing an article about an upcoming building because someone was buying drafting pens. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 10:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha, I'll have to remember that analogy for future AfDs. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 13:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete *sigh* I've worked my ass off to get this article to a decent level (trust me, it was utter shit before), but I have to agree, there's almost nothing going on with this particular project. Damn. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 16:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources for any of teh information. -- Whpq 16:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge with either Mortal Kombat (film) or Mortal Kombat: Annihilation until further information is available. While I wish there were reliable sources apart from these this movie seems to be stuck in development hell and therefore everything in the article is just pure speculation. ~ ~ James Hetfield (previously Wesborland) ~ ~ 17:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Suggestion I'd be okay with it being moved into my userspace so that it can continue to be updated if anything actually happens on the project. User:EVula/MK: Devastation would work just fine for me. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 17:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I had thought of that too. I've copied the entire page here along with some older versions so that we can keep working on it after it's been deleted. ~ ~ James Hetfield (previously Wesborland) ~ ~ 20:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. While I can only wish a new (and good) film was in the works, we've just had nothing concrete on the matter.  Potentially the biggest MK-related rumour since Ermac in MK1.  --L T Dangerous 22:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 05:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Userfy to preserve history instead of deleting. Copying and deleting violates the GFDL because of technical limitations in Mediawiki. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.