Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosaad Megahed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America1000 03:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Mosaad Megahed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prof. Megahed seems to be a relatively senior professor, but not notable to the extent required by WP:PROF. Slashme (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 00:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof with a GS h-index of 24. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC).


 * Keep. Megahed has identified and cloned a human gene named LAD1. There was no link set to LAD1, where he was already cited. Megaheds h-index is even 28. Kipepea (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: LAD1 is a gene for a protein with unclear function. At the moment, there are more than 92 thousand known human proteins. If we consider anyone who has identified and cloned a human protein to be notable, that's a lot of people. Also, WP:PROF cautions against using a person's h-index to determine notability. --Slashme (talk) 12:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:03, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Many highly-cited publications demonstrate a clear pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:43, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.