Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosaics within Mosaics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Additionally, there is potential for this to be merged to Circulatory System (band), per the discussion herein. The nomination also recommends merging. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 21:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Mosaics within Mosaics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I also put a merge tag on this-yes it is listed as upcoming albums-but with no info-so I say the best might be to merge this with that band until more info comes. Or if an expert about the band can come in. Wgolf (talk) 16:21, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: per CRYSTAL. Keep or Merge (if not notable), as is standard with these types of articles, per Drowninginlimbo (below), who makes a good point.   GenQuest  "Talk to Me" 21:59, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Album has release date and tracklisting, as well as some coverage in music press. Will only be recreated a month from now if deleted --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 21:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment-I think in that case-a merge or redirect might be the best until it gets closer. Wgolf (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Where is the line for notability here? I am somewhat unfamiliar with how the notability of a band, an album, a song, etc. are decided upon.  I would lean here towards a merge if the thing is even notable / going to be notable / considered notable .  But we don't know this yet, or do the music and pop culture articles use a different standard than the rest of Wikipedia.  These type of AfDs always seem subjective to me.  Is this a much-awaited release; or notable for some other reason?  (To me, it's an obscure album by an obscure band.)  Or, does everything in the music and entertainment genres just get an article, no proof needed?  I really would like to know.   GenQuest  "Talk to Me" 20:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge - I hesitate to try to predict which albums will be notable before they are actually released. I've never heard of this band, which doesn't necessarily mean anything, but it makes me think that a merge onto their general page would be a better option at this point. To me, it seems unlikely that this album will gain enough notability that it will warrant its own page even if it has a reasonable amount of coverage after its release. The only time I'd argue to keep an article about a yet to be released album is if it's like Michael Jackson or Lady Gaga and it's being talked about to death. I'd say there likely won't be enough about this album that it can't be reasonably covered on the band's main page. Bali88 (talk) 06:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Seconding Drowninginlimbo, I created article and "album has release date and tracklisting, as well as some coverage in music press." It will be recreated if deleted. I'm not sure why notability is a part of this proposal as it doesn't apply here, there is already a huge article and Template:E6 covering these groups. --Dylanbud (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment A stand-alone article in Wikipedia must first and foremost be notable to be kept around. And keep in mind, a lot of "buzz" is not notability-inducing, just publicity which quickly fades.  Since notability is not inherited (automatic), nor can future notability be guessed at, there is a huge question as to the creation of, and the keeping of, this article as a stand-a-lone article.  What is notable about this album?  or any of Circulatory System's albums?  I would suggest they should all be merged into the main article per Wikipedia music notability policies.   GenQuest  "Talk to Me" 03:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.