Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosh Girl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 21:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Mosh Girl

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

At its core this is just a non-notable person, and borderline violation of our policy on attack pages. The only reliable source - a purported article from News.com which is sourced from a third party - mentions this among several internet phenomena which had been noted around 2005. I don't find many contemporary RS's. This is a fad which already died out and probably doesn't need to have an article. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and selective paste merger to List of Internet phenomena if at least deemed mildly notable and the WP:NPA issue is addressed. SoSaysChappy (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches using Google and Google News for "Mosh Girl" (without quotes) do not turn up any WP:reliable sources. While the fad is covered in the News.com article it cites, WP:N requires multiple sources, which this does not seem to have. (Note that if other reliable sources can be found, I will change my !vote to merge, or possibly keep).--Unscented (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I've added more links to that article and it was interesting reading for me (I know almost nothing about the Internet phenomena), but this isn't worthy of own Wikipedia article. I agree with nominator. --Vejvančický (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm kinda sure we've already deleted this before. Obvious BLP vio. JuJube (talk) 02:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Found the previous debates at Articles for deletion/Moshzilla and Articles for deletion/Moshzilla (2nd nomination). JuJube (talk) 03:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not worth the effort to figure out a blp compliant version.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.