Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosh News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Mosh News

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Absolutely no indication of any form of notability. It looks impressive enough, sure, except almost all of the references are related to the magazine's subjects rather than the magazine. While they were nominated for an award, it was an award from a local newspaper in Hull. Ironholds (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Overblown claims. Close to speedy for spam. --Randykitty (talk) 04:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * DElete -- Little evidence for its claims. It all feels like hot air to me!  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.