Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosiac model


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Mosiac model
Delete, poorly written, unsourced piece about alleged marginal pseudo-scientific theory, sounds highly fishy, possibly hoax. Neither of the two alleged proponents can be found on Google. "Fluid mosiac model" itself seems to be a legitimate concept in cell biology, but this alleged application to sex is completely unverifiable. Lukas 10:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable per nomination. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-18 11:09Z 
 * Delete as WP:BALLS--Ezeu 11:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete bad hoax. Kusma (討論) 11:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons above. PJM 12:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 12:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Terence Ong 12:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODNed. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE  16:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all i can say is 'wtf' B.ellis 21:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ezeu... this is the most nearly literal example of WP:BALLS that I've seen. Barno 01:25, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.