Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moss culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Moss culture

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a how-to guide for culturing moss for agricultural purposes. The article is poorly written and, in my view, unsalvageable. Richard Cavell (talk) 04:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete per WP:NOR. This looks more like a student's agricultural research paper or project. • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Say, Gene93k, is that a stab at ag-schools? Some of them do know how to teach writing, you know! Seriously, delete as fast as possible. Original research, school project, unverified, not really in English, etc. Drmies (talk) 05:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as how-to guide, the introduction says it all. --Ouro (blah blah) 13:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It is a how-to guide, and an original research paper for school. There is also a bit of personal opinion in the article regarding the contention that moss would make good feed.  The wording is poor but that is not criteria for deletion.  Since the content of the article is entirely original research and a summary of a school lab assignment, and the subject is not one of sufficient notability, the article should be deleted.  Theseeker4 (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia isn't a how-to guide. This is completely unsourcable and does not appear to have anything written outside the realm of WP:OR even if it was not. Trusilver  17:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to Wikibooks. It would be more appropriate place for this one there. --GreyCat (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.