Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. we wouldn't usually merge an unsourced article and there is no consensus that churches are intrinsically notable so the policy based arguments are the ones supporting deletion Spartaz Humbug! 03:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Most Pure Heart of Mary Catholic Church, Topeka, Kansas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article was originally built by the creator at the AFC space and then subsequently moved to the mainspace (although I think this was an accident). The church itself isn't notable and other than the orphanage which it ran, there is nothing big about it. Maybe a page on the orphanage should be created but the church itself just isn't notable. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 01:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No refs provided to satisfy WP:ORG or WP:N. Edison (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is part of the historic district, National Register. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That doesn't necessarily make it notable. If my house is part of a historic district but isn't individually mentioned, that doesn't necessarily make it notable for a Wikipedia article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:14, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge a summary to Topeka, Kansas. Unless the building itself, rather than the district it is in, is on the register the building itslef will be NN.  However, it is useful to add the main churches of a city (and other locally important facilities) to its article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.