Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of notability has been presented. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 13:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Almost every page and article linked to from this page has been deleted at AFD. Entirely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge to the league article. With no sources, you can't support a separate article, but a mention on the league's page (the league awarded an MVP trophy, etc) is fine. Find a source for the winners and you might be able to justify mentioning them as well - but given the results at AFD to date, that doesn't look like a great prospect. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment - I would have no objection to the article being merged. I would have just done that except there are so many editors who think I'm on a crusade against roller hockey that any changes made to those pages by me are immediately reverted, regardless of what they are. So I have to take everything to AFD. -- Zackmann08  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom.  Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I cannot find any justification per WP:GNG for inclusion.  While an MVP award seems like it should be notable, not having any sourcing (either through my own search or what's [not] listed on Most Valuable Player Award (PIHA) itself) proves otherwise.  Unless references are found, this has to be deleted. GauchoDude (talk) 19:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.