Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most common words in Esperanto (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Most common words in Esperanto
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I interpret the author's comments on the article's talk page to mean that all the data in the article is a product of original research. The topic is notable, but the entire article appears to be OR.

An AfD in 2006 did not reach consensus. This seems to be because the participants didn't understand that this is not a case where one finds sources to support the content that's already in the article. Any reliable sources will use completely different data. A proper article might summarise the findings published in primary or secondary sources, but it would not try to reconcile them with OR. Ringbang (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * delete as obvious original research. Mangoe (talk) 16:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOR. Ajf773 (talk) 22:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 10:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.