Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most of us are here against our will


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Invoking admin discretion, however, I'm going to redirect it to a quickie stub about the author (having published work in Atlantic Monthly passes my own sniff test), and invite anybody who knows more than I do about him to expand it. Bearcat (talk) 01:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Most of us are here against our will

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Was tagged for CSD G11, but I'm not sure it meets the definition of spam. It seems to be a borderline notable subject; it does cite several reputable sources. Keilana | Parlez ici 23:23, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to "David S. Levinson". There really ought to be a disambiguation page for David Levinson, in that we already have articles abot David A. Levinson, David B. Levinson, and David N. Levinson.  This newly published author, David Samuel Levinson, is none of the above. Mandsford (talk) 00:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Move and expand into a short article on the author and his work (David Levinson (author) would be my choice). His bio, plus the sources already mentioned, suggests a way of asserting notability here. (BTW, this is an informal offer to do some of the work here, not just a "keep and run".) --Sturm 01:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The article needs to be about the guy to move it to his title, and there is little here to indicate that he is notable anyway. A search online doesn't provide much help in that respect either - I found his home page, which refers to a few awards, but none significant. This article is about the book, or to be more precise, the reviews it has received, and thus serves as little more than an advertisement. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable book Beeblbrox (talk) 04:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.