Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Non admin closure.  §hawn poo   22:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Mostly Ghostly: Who Let the Ghosts Out?

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Straight-to-video film. No suggestion of greater impact or notice. A PROD tag was added, but removed with the evidence-free edit summary, 'm the actors in the movie are notable and so is the director. It's a popular movie among children.' CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - What type of impact are you looking for? THe movie is full of notable actors and actress as well as the Director.  It had a huge debut September 30, 2008.  Some movies go straight to video that doesn't make them unnotable.  THe book and movie are popular among children.  Fighting for Justice (talk) 06:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Did you list this here by accident? You stated yourself the actors and directors are notable and it is popular among kids. Also a simple google search here shows that this is a notable movie.  §hawn poo   06:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable video after google searches. Let's focus on the article, not the nom. Shadowjams (talk) 06:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and add decent references. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 08:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons mentions above.  D r e a m Focus  10:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The removal of the PROD might've been without added evidence, but for a deletion to work you've got to check for sources yourself. Anyone who calls work by R.L. Stine after that must not have searched in the right places. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep While I will note notability is WP:NOTINHERITED, the sheer number of highly notable people involved makes this a clearly notable movie. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.