Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother-Daughter Exchange Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:41, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Mother-Daughter Exchange Club

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A directory-like page on an unremarkable film series; significant RS coverage cannot be found. The article does not cite any sources that are not award materials or PR driven. The industry awards do not overcome the lack of reliable secondary sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Easy one I'd say, if the individual movies are notable, they could be listed, however the series as a whole is not. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOTDIRECTORY. No prose. No encylopedic information, no secondary source content, no commentary. Other websites record directory information like this. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. AVN Best Older Woman/Younger Girl Release and Best Specialty Series - Other Genre wins aren't notable? Please direct me to the consensus for that. (I also fail to see how this is a directory; not to mention that the notion that all the sources are PR driven is inaccurate.)  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 02:28, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Our core content policy Verifiability requires that we "base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." There are no such independent, reliable sources in the article and I have been unable to find any such sources. Unless such sources are brought forward, this article should be deleted. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete lack of adequate sources to support article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable pornographic film series, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's accurate analysis. Even if the cited awards were "notable", a dubious claim, the actual NFILM criterion is a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking, a bar these tinfoil trophies handed out by a trade magazine to its advertisers fall far, far, far below. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 23:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge all relevant content to Girlfriends Films. NOTE: I've recently edited the article in question here, but I have not done an extensive amount of research on the subject of this article though. The subject here does not appear to meet the notability standard for films yet. The awards won by this film series are not "major awards for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking"...they are minor, niche awards at best that are not at all "handed out by a trade magazine to its advertisers". There are also no "promotional" citations in this article now, and the remaining citations are reliable for what they are trying to cite. Guy1890 (talk) 04:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This may be sensible and acceptable. Mention of this series is appropriate at that Girlfriends Films.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment -- I don't see a reason for Merge/Redirect as the target article does not discuss the subject, and there are no sources listed in the present page to enable any sort of encyclopedic content. Please also see a similar situation with a redirect that resulted from a deletion discussion:
 * Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 17
 * The redirect above was deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - The article Girlfriends Films does, in fact, mention the subject of this AfD here, and it also links to List of awards and nominations received by Girlfriends Films, which mentions the subject of this AfD several times as well.
 * The redirect for Big Tits at School (which was originally enacted in this AfD instead of a merge) was unfortunately deleted (despite the subject of that redirect being mentioned several times at Brazzers) after all of the original incoming Wiki-links to it were likely deleted in advance of the above-mentioned RfD. Guy1890 (talk) 07:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * To quote from the Big Tits RfD: Delete: The name of the film occurs four times at the target; redirects don't need to be linked from any page to be useful (many, especially e.g. ones based on typos, won't be); it isn't a synonym. It is mentioned at the target. It was the result of an AfD. It doubles as a preservation of the history of what was formerly an article. All of that almost made me suggest keeping this and refining it to the awards section. However, there are 19 volumes in the film series. The current target doesn't talk about the films, it merely lists a few because of the awards that they won. (...) There isn't a better target, and I think the search engine handles this adequately. This sums up it pretty well. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.