Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother of all battles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Snowclone. Select verifiable entries can be merged from the history.  So Why  09:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Mother of all battles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

(not a !vote) Not really a disambig page. It is an euphemism used by some to describe some battles, not really mane them. Similarly, Idiot (disambiguation) does not list Donald Trump, although not an uncommon reference.
 * redirect to Snowclone Staszek Lem (talk) 16:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems to be a pretty useful DAB page, at least according to the pageviews for it: Daily pageviews. Thus, I'd say that it serves a useful navigation purpose and should not be deleted. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  16:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge entries to Snowclone per my reasoning at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation to preserve the links at the target. User:RileyBugz yes I think that's the counterargument, as this dab doesn't conform to our usual format WP:MOSDAB but is useful and used. If the links were at the target, that would IMHO work better as it contextualises the fact that 1500 years worth of battles may be referred to with the quote "Mother of all battles", and it's more Wikiquote and Wiktionary than WP. Widefox ; talk 16:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment we do have List of scandals with "-gate" suffix, so we could convert the dab to a list, but the inclusion criteria based on a quote seems not solid. Of note is that the -gate topic is also covered in Snowclone. Widefox ; talk 16:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or 'redirect to Snowclone I guess, or some other outcome which is helpful to the reader. I mean it seems to me like this: The user types in the string "mother of all battles". Presumably the reader wants some information. So how should we handle this request for information? Well...
 * We can take her to this page, where she can then maybe drill down further to get to where she maybe wants to go.
 * Or we could take her somewhere else. Gulf War, maybe (perhaps that is the primary topic for the string) or perhaps to Snowclone if that seems better (although the person did include "battles" specifically) or some other place that is helpful to the reader.
 * Or we could delete this page as suggested, and leave her in the dark. Perhaps we could replace the page with a notice "Yes, we have this info, but we don't feel like taking you to it, so you're shit out of luck. But good luck with your Google search!". We could do that.
 * But I'm not seeing the win-win for option three, tbh. Herostratus (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Herostratus Yes, I would also support a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC redirect targeting Snowclone anyhow. Would merge be an option for her? Another outcome is redirect to a section of List of "mother of all". Widefox ; talk 17:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Right, this seems sensible. I changed my vote to "keep or redirect" and either is fine. Herostratus (talk) 17:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: useful dab for the reader who comes across the phrase. (My reluctance to redirect to Snowclone is at least in part because I've literally never come across that word before). Pam  D  08:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Once again, this is not a DAB page according to our rules. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gulf War, which seems to be by far the most common use of this phrase. A merge of info and redirect to Snowclone wouldn't be terrible but it seems wrong to list all instances of all variants of "Mother of all..." in the same subsection of the Snowclone article (this could produce a very unbalanced article once you add Mother of all Bombs, etc); maybe a separate article on "Mother of all X" could be justified. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Used in English, and WP:RECENTly, but that popularity is surely more snowclone. Used before that for 1500years, and we have no good way of including these items on a dab (quotes on dabs seem to fall between the crack of WP, Wikt, and WQuote). Widefox ; talk 12:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Currently there a variety of choices!
 * Redirect to Snowclone. The list currently present in the article under discussion is subjective and not useful. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  05:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is a topic for Urban Dictionary. The list is just a coatrack for puffery-filled military propaganda. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep highly useful. CJK09 (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.