Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother of the bride


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  19:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Mother of the bride

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a "how to" manual. I guess an article could be written about 'mother of the bride', but this isn't it, and it wouldn't be a good idea to leave this until someone replaces it with something else. JoanneB 18:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is a prime example of what Wikipedia is not. Nom is right in that this needs to go until someone is prepared to write a proper Mother of the bride article that is not so US/UK centric. Nuttah68 18:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a "how-to" manual. The article is certainly one. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 19:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and send to WP:RA. --N Shar 19:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Would almost pass a speedy as no context, but not quite. As it is, it certainly fails WP:NOT, WP:OR and WP:V. To be fair, the article is completely POV. J Milburn 20:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mother-in-law: Since that's what a mother of the bride is.--SeizureDog 20:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per SeizureDog, unlist from VfD. Pavel Vozenilek 22:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete Poorly written. No WP:RS and all WP:OR --Sefringle 06:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Expectations of the mother of the bride will vary from one culture and country to another, and this one does not say whether it describes Greek-Americans, Bengali Brits or Hong Kong Buddhists! Therefore do not send to WP:RA; even a whole series of articles on this particular role around the world is not desirable (although a series on marriage and wedding customs in different cultures might be good). Do not redirect to M-in-Law either - this title describes a role for an event, whereas that is a lasting relationship. - Fayenatic london (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.