Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motion (conference)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Motion (conference)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional and lacking decent references Rathfelder (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Reads like a promotional article, totally unsourced and fails WP:NCORP. If it somehow ends up being kept it needs a serious rework but it really should be deleted entirely MDDevice talk 18:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is an editor's nightmare. "It's" instead of its, run-on sentences, only a single reliable source on the page, a wandering story, poor formatting, a lead that's buried, and hidden blue links. It might be marginally notable, but it's just too much work to fix. Sorry. Bearian (talk) 15:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a Soapbox  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 14:05, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Wm335td (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.