Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motley's Crew (August 28, 1997)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 03:44, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Motley's Crew (August 28, 1997)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an article about a specific episode of the comic strip Motley's Crew. There was nothing unusual or notable about this episode. The only reason this page seems to exist is because this episode is the image used on the main Motley's Crew page. Howicus (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. This appears to be an over-detailed explication of a single run-of-the-mill episode of a not-particularly-distinguished comic strip. An individual episode of a comic strip would have to be very unusual to justify having a separate article about it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not really make a claim to significance; however, I don't really see a CSD that covers this kind of thing.   dci  &#124;  TALK   02:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into Rivalries of Mike Motley. This comic strip episode mostly deals with Mike Motley's rivalry with Abel and Buffy and deals with the situation with a humorous grasp. GVnayR (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete'. Also, what are these? Mr. and Mrs. Motley, Mrs. Motley, Mr. Motley ? --HighFunctioningAutismIsVeryCreepy (talk) 03:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've nominated them all, and more, for deletion. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as utterly unnotable. A lot more Afds are in the offing ... Clarityfiend (talk) 08:50, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless this specific day's strip gets coverage in books and/or academic journals. Individual days' comic strips cannot be notable without extraordinary coverage.  Nyttend (talk) 20:10, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * After doing some quiet contemplating and some scholarly research, I have decided to change my vote to delete. GVnayR (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: "After doing some quiet contemplating and some scholarly research bla bla bla". Always the same sh*t story, gvnayr, and because of that you already WASTED other ppls time... how about making the quiet contemplating (er?) and some (only some?) scholarly research before creating pages like a... [insert adjective].
 * Wikipedians, this is very important, please read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hydao&diff=prev&oldid=537474309
 * "Hi, We're on completely different sides of this project, but we have a similar issue: I've had some concerns about this user, as he has turned many of the articles in my current region into a gigantic mess. I don't think he means harm, but it's really disruptive, and ultimately just wastes resources of editors. I've actually not bothered with the revamp I'd like to make to these articles because I know they'll be filled with nonsense. He seems to come back after leaving, if you ever need anything from me to get this addressed by a higher-up, please just ask."
 * And also this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theleftorium&diff=543004791&oldid=542663551
 * Honestly, do someone know what to do with this gvnayr user....? --HighFunctioningAutismIsVeryCreepy (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Uh, wow. I know that Wikipedia is not paper, but come on! Decidedly non-notable and lacking in secondary sources. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.