Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotoParking


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Two relists without additional comment mean this can't be closed on the basis of an actionable consensus. KaisaL (talk) 01:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

MotoParking

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Utterly trivial, with primarily local notices  DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I concur, there's nothing here at all to suggest massive notability apart from its apparent use at a few cities. Nothing convincing here, SwisterTwister   talk  00:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:53, 5 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep While not very widely used, certainly seems to be a system used in a number of cities, and different countries, with a few references. Seems notable 04:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I found some more references in the news I'll add momentarily, all RS. I used them all the time riding through the UK. Jeremy112233 ( Lettuce-jibber-jabber? ) 15:48, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I've said delete to quite a few business and organizations I know of, or even use. That's not the standard for notability  DGG ( talk ) 08:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete The parking system is quite new and doesn't seem to be used widely enough. Notability is not simply existence. The sources I see in the article are questionable/self published/non-independent/local/primary. Some of them are reviews in non-notable online magazines (the kind a company can just pay and get). Others are routine local news of installation of a parking system. This fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD. In addition, one of the references used does not backup the claim "MotoParking is a title sponsor of the European Formula 3 Championship". To top it all, the tone of the article is hopelessly promotional. This seems to me an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion and should be deleted. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SST  flyer  04:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.