Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcycle land speed record


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, as keep is unopposed, and nomination withdrawn. Patstuarttalk 14:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Motorcycle land speed record

 * — (View AfD)

Wikipedia is not a list of things; claims to have been "under construction" by creator who's not returned. Patstuarttalk 00:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. What this article really needs is a cleanup tag in place of the "under construction" phrase, and serious re-writing by someone who knows the topic. The term itself has plenty of ghits appears to be commonly used in the world of speed enthusiasts, and is highly capable of a proper article. Bad writing and lack of proper wikification really doesn't mean the article ought to be deleted. Agent 86 01:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is worthwhile material and there's precedence for this kind of material on the Wiki. As Agent 86 says above, AfD is not Cleanup. A Train take the 01:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I was in the middle of editing Flight airspeed record when I took a break and saw this AFD. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 01:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the article can be cleaned up but is important enough not to be deleted. TSO1D 02:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. Daniel5127 &lt;Talk&gt; 02:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, some encyclopedic material that needs lots of cleanup. Not worthy for deletion though. Ter e nce Ong 08:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep with massive re-write. SkierRMH, 09:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not ready for deletion yet. --Sapphire Flame 13:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - thank you all for your input. And thank you all who are knowledgeable about the subject for cleaning it up at that. I withdraw my nomination, as this is clearly a more important subject than I realized. -Patstuarttalk 14:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.